Theories of evolution of mankind, animals and the universe have been the basis of scientists in trying to explain as to how life came into existence. Their views have not gone down well with religious people who believe in creation by God as stated in Genesis in the bible. This group believes God created everything in six days and rested on the seventh day. For this reason, a number of arguments against evolution theories have been advanced.
The first argument is that living things come from their own. There is no way they could have developed from non living things. The general view is that there has to be a parent of opposite sex for life to come about. These theories on the other hand state otherwise and they have no proof to support their claim; just word of mouth.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.
In other terms, change comes into existence from organized form to disorganized ones. The view of matter moving from disorganized to organized is not a reality in any way. With transition still in existence, diminishing of any kind is can be noted. As of such, deformation is being experienced as of today. This makes their theories not to hold any ground with mere speculations and no concrete evidence.
Others believe in mutation as the process which brought about human beings and other living things. Usually when matter mutates, it forms new generic materials. This does not support this theory in any way. Besides, the mutating matter cannot transform itself to something different from the original bodies. This point to the previous argument that matters usually moves from an orderly state to a disorderly one.
Cell division is another component where these scientists have based their arguments. For this to occur, a lot of time is needed since the entire process is very slow. Besides, the new bodies or cells formed are an imitation of the original matter and nothing different.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
The first argument is that living things come from their own. There is no way they could have developed from non living things. The general view is that there has to be a parent of opposite sex for life to come about. These theories on the other hand state otherwise and they have no proof to support their claim; just word of mouth.
On the side of universe, they believe it formed on its own from deformed matter. The weight is thrown behind the force of gravity. The biblical version denotes otherwise where God spent six days to create everything and He rested on the seventh day. Just mere statements of unknown force called gravity are not sufficient enough to support these theories.
In this perspective, it is not logical for matters to pile up on their own into well formed and organized things. There has to be an intellectual force behind this and at this point, God comes into the picture. He is the creator of earth, sky and all that are in it as stated in the first book of the bible. The idea of gravitational force is unrealistic since with the passage of time, it should have declined in strength as of today.
In other terms, change comes into existence from organized form to disorganized ones. The view of matter moving from disorganized to organized is not a reality in any way. With transition still in existence, diminishing of any kind is can be noted. As of such, deformation is being experienced as of today. This makes their theories not to hold any ground with mere speculations and no concrete evidence.
Others believe in mutation as the process which brought about human beings and other living things. Usually when matter mutates, it forms new generic materials. This does not support this theory in any way. Besides, the mutating matter cannot transform itself to something different from the original bodies. This point to the previous argument that matters usually moves from an orderly state to a disorderly one.
Cell division is another component where these scientists have based their arguments. For this to occur, a lot of time is needed since the entire process is very slow. Besides, the new bodies or cells formed are an imitation of the original matter and nothing different.
With all these in place, arguments against evolution theories have turned to be more realistic. There is clarity and all the available pieces of evidence point to the existence of intellectual being who was organized in coming up with the entire creation. All these are therefore the works of God.
About the Author:
You can visit the website daywithoutyesterday.net for more helpful information about Probable Arguments Against Evolution Theories
No comments:
Post a Comment